____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

General

Home: George's Daily

Welcome New Readers

Classic Links

George's Musings 5/14/12

Alerts                

Contact Us or Receive GIAC Weekly E-mails

National Resources

Remember in November: 2010, 2012 and 2014

Voting System and Fraud Prevention Tradeoffs

Ensuring Valid Vote Counts

Voting System Recommendations

A Road Map for America's Future

Republican Party Organization Process

Republican Medicare and Social Security Plans

National Commentary

Wake up America!

CBO Analysis of Congressman Ryan's Roadmap

'Contract From America'

Public Education

Tea Party America Refounding Principles

Other Menus

Nation/World/Features

South Carolina

Horry County

References

Site Navigation

Navigation Tips and Site Description

■Index for GIAC Site

Web Site Link Menu Collection/Explanation

Growth Impact Action Committee:

Horry County and South Carolina

Growth Impact Action Committee Roadmap

How to be Effective

What Now on Growth's Fiscal Impact  2/18/09

GIAC Visions 1/26/09

Envision 2025 Comp Plan 10/9/07

Imperative Horry County Ordinances 8/30/07

Priority Investment Act 5/26/07

Golf Course Rezoning Proposals 3/14/07

Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, etc. 11/25/06

The "Takings Issue" 8/22/06

Home Rule When Allowed 10/9/05

Growth Impact Action Committee Position

 

According to the July 28 Washington Times: “Pelosi House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi suggested Thursday that a House Republican deficit-reduction proposal could lead to the end of Medicare.” This is so ridiculous. There is no end to the lies that the Democrats will tell to scare seniors. 

 

The Rep. Paul Ryan Republican plan which apparently is no longer in contention because Democrats consider it too extreme, explicitly does not make any change in either Medicare or Social Security for those older than 55.

 

Its Medicare plan "provides a 'refundable tax credit' [payment regardless of income tax liability] of $2,300 for individuals and $5,700 for families" made directly to the health insurance plan of the individual's choice, offered by any state, and fully portable from job to job.

·        It fully funds Medical Savings Accounts for low incomes and allows all beneficiaries to set up tax-free MSAs.

·        It provides Medicaid beneficiaries with nearly $11,000 for health care costs.

·        It offers coverage through a state based exchange that meets the "same statutory standard used for the health benefits given to Members of Congress."

·        It provides for state health insurance high-risk pools for individuals who would otherwise be denied coverage due to pre-existing conditions.

·        And "The proposal limits lawsuit abuse without limiting legal justice" with a cap on non-economic damages "and assisting States in establishing solutions to medical tort litigation.”

 

The Congressional Budget Office indicates "these reforms will make Medicare permanently solvent."

 

The Social Security segment of the Ryan plan: in addition to not affecting anyone older than 55 provides the option for those under 55 “of investing over one third of their current Social Security Taxes into personal retiremnt accounts similar to theThrift savings Plan available to Federal employees” or to stay in the current plan.

  • It guarantees “that individuals will not lose a dollar they contribute to their accounts, even after inflation.”

  • “Each personal account is the property of the individual and the resource accumulated can be passed on to the individual’s descendants.

  • “When fully phased in, the personal accounts will average 5.1 percentage points of the current 12.4 percent Social Security payroll tax.”

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Ryan Social Security Plan: “Makes the program permanently solvent . . . by combining a more realistic measure of growth in Social Securities initial benefits, with an eventual modernization of the retirement age.” The proposal would “have the effect of increasing the retirement age by 1 month every 2 years . . . until it reaches 70 in the next century.” 

 

An individual under 55 has remarked: “I don’t care if the retirement age is changed to 85, under the current system, Social Security will not even be in existence by then.”

 

These are the facts. The approaches are surprisingly scored to save Medicare and Social Security by the Congressional Budget office and I believe quite compassionate.